Clinic scribe or hospital scribe? Start with your setting.
Clinic scribes are built for the consult room. aurii is built for the private-hospital round, where one spoken review becomes the whole episode's paperwork.
The question is where you work.
Clinic scribes are good products. Most of them grew up in the GP clinic: one consult room, one appointment, one note. They are strong in that lane, and if that is your day, evaluate them seriously; aurii grew up somewhere else: the private-hospital ward round, where one spoken review per bed has to become the whole of the episode's paperwork, before you leave the ward. That difference in birthplace is the real comparison.
When a clinic scribe fits
- Your day is appointments in rooms, not beds on wards
- The output you need is the consult note, maybe a letter
- Billing runs through your practice software after the fact
- Admissions and discharges are not your paperwork
If this is you, shortlist the clinic scribes and check their current docs directly; they move fast and their own pages are the fair source.
When aurii fits
- You round at one or more private hospitals
- One spoken review must become four documents
- Private health fund billing should be captured at the bedside, signed by you
- Letters need to reach GPs via Medical Objects with delivery tracking
- Discharge summaries gate bed flow and cannot wait for the weekend
The whole platform is one plan: A$199 + GST per clinician per month.
The full pricingOne post-op review, spoken once.
A surgeon reviews a day-two laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the morning round and speaks for about two minutes: recovery, wound, obs, the plan. From that one recording, four documents draft themselves.
- Chart The progress note, drafted for the chart from the spoken review, in the surgeon's own structure.
- Correspondence The letter back to the referring GP, so the practice that sent the patient hears how the operation went.
- Discharge The discharge summary, building in the background from each day's review, not written from memory at the end.
- Billing The health-fund billing items, for the review, captured at the bedside instead of reconstructed from paper later.
Nothing is filed or sent until it is signed. That is the shape of work a clinic scribe never has to attempt, because a clinic does not have it.
Asked by specialists comparing scribes.
Only if your work is the inpatient round. A clinic scribe is shaped around the consult in rooms; aurii is shaped around the private-hospital admission, where one spoken review per patient covers the whole episode's paperwork. A GP clinic is probably better served by a clinic-focused scribe. A specialist rounding at a private hospital is who aurii is built for.
Yes, and some specialists will. If you consult in rooms with one tool you like, keep it; aurii earns its place on the ward: admissions, round visits, discharge-gated bed flow and in-hospital billing capture are the lane it is built for. Nothing about aurii requires it to be your only scribe.
A$199 + GST per clinician per month, everything included. At 30 consults a week that is about A$1.55 a consult. There are no per-note charges and no feature tiers.
In Australia: hosted in Sydney with a Melbourne backup, encrypted, with a 7-year tamper-evident audit trail.
We publish a vendor-agnostic evaluation checklist: twenty questions on data, security, clinical safety, commercial terms and operations, each with why it matters. Send it to every vendor you are considering, us included. It is at How to evaluate an AI medical scribe.
Deciding between scribes?
The twenty-question evaluation checklist, to put to every vendor including us, is linked in the FAQ above. Leave your email and we'll be in touch. No spam, unsubscribe any time.