Safe by design.
The clinician stays in control of every word.
The clinician always signs.
Drafting is separated from signing by design. The draft is a starting point; the signature is the decision, and only a person makes it.
Drafting and signing are two different things
A draft is a convenience; a signature is a clinical decision. Keeping them apart means the decision belongs to a person.
A draft until a clinician signs it
A worked example of what aurii hands to the clinician: a structured draft, marked for sign-off, on a synthetic patient. It stays this way until a named clinician reads it, corrects it and signs. Nothing about it is filed, sent or billed while it looks like this.
- Continue current medication at the same dose
- Home readings for two weeks, bring the log to review
- Routine bloods requested, results to be discussed at next visit
Designed around RACGP guidance.
The RACGP has published guidance on AI scribes. We designed aurii around it, and we say plainly that we are not endorsed by them.
The clinician reviews and signs the note
The RACGP's central point: the AI assists with documentation, and the clinician checks and approves what it produces. Drafting is the AI's job; the note is the clinician's.
RACGP guidance on AI scribesAligned with the guidance, not endorsed by the RACGP
"Aligned with" means we built aurii to fit how the RACGP describes safe use of an AI scribe. It does not mean the RACGP has reviewed, approved or endorsed aurii. They have not, and we will never claim they have.
Consent and disclosure work the same way: AI-scribe use should be explained to the patient and consented to, and aurii supports that; the conversation stays between clinician and patient.
To answer the question before it is asked, print the patient consent sheet for your waiting room. One A4 page, plain language, with a code the patient can scan for the longer explainer.
Printable patient consent sheetaurii never makes the clinical call.
Documentation is the whole job. Here is where that line sits, and what it rules out.
- Diagnose, or suggest a diagnosis
- Triage, or rank clinical urgency
- Flag, interpret or alert on results
- Recommend treatment or medication
- Make, or act on, any clinical decision
- Draft the note from what you say at the bedside
- Draft GP and referrer letters and discharge summaries
- Capture the billing items the clinician confirms
- Present it all for the clinician to review and sign
- Keep a tamper-evident record of every step
Nothing clinical is decided by aurii. The decisions come from the clinician's judgement, review and signature; aurii documents them. For how ambient scribes and clinical decision support software are regulated in Australia, see the TGA guidance on clinical decision support software
How we keep drafting reliable.
We won't quote an accuracy figure. Quality depends on the consult, and one number would hide more than it tells. Here is the mechanism instead.
The process is the safety, and the audit proves it happened
Safety here comes from a recorded process, not a claim of perfect drafting. Every step, drafted, edited, reviewed, signed and issued, is written to an append-only, hash-chained record with actor and time. Question a note and the chain shows exactly what happened.
- Recorded Every action, every actor. The review and the signature are recorded events, not assumptions, so the safety step is verifiable afterwards.
- Seven years Kept in Australia, the whole time. Held to Australian clinical record-keeping expectations, in-region for seven years. Full architecture on the security page.
Clinician review is the safety net
The most reliable check on any draft is the clinician reading it. Review is unavoidable, not optional. The draft cannot become a record without it. A wrong draft, corrected and signed, is a correct record.
Structured templates per document type
A progress note, GP letter, discharge summary and billing item each have their own structure. Drafting to a defined template per type keeps output predictable, so a missing or misplaced detail stands out on review.
The clinician's edits are the ground truth
When a clinician corrects a draft, the corrected version is what counts and what is recorded. An edit is never overridden; aurii never "puts back" its own wording. The person has the last word, on every line.
Built on a transcript you can check
Drafting works from the consult aurii captured, not from memory. The clinician can compare the draft against what was said before signing. The source is right there to check.
Honest about the limits
AI drafting can mishear, miss nuance or phrase something awkwardly. We don't pretend otherwise, which is exactly why the clinician's review and signature are required, not advisory. The safety comes from the process, not from a claim of perfect drafting.
Clinical safety and data safety go together.
Your data lives in Australia, encrypted record by record, isolated to your practice, with every action written to a tamper-evident audit you can verify.
The doctor decides.
aurii does the writing.
Bring the safety questions your clinical governance team will ask. We built aurii so the answer is always the same: a named clinician reviews and signs.
hello@aurii.com.au